Thoughts from the journey of one Christian sailor.
Sailing for Home
  • Home
  • About Me
  • My 25 Theses
  • Blog
  • Randomness
  • Books/Resources
  • Submit Content!
  • Information/Legal Stuff

Criminal In The White House

11/23/2019

2 Comments

 
I've spent the last three or so years on this blog trying to convince everyone who will listen that Donald Trump is not someone who Bible-believing Christians should be defending, let alone cheering for. Whereas most of my arguments are Biblical in nature, and based largely on judgments of his actions and character, I now also appeal to law and linguistics.

The following is a quote from my textbook used in the Forensic Linguistics class I took last semester (Solan, L. M. & Tiersma, P. M. (2005). Speaking of Crime: the Language of Criminal Justice. Chicago University Press, p.181.):
Solicitation
Not only is it illegal to commit a crime, but people can also be punished for asking or inducing someone else to do so. This is the crime of solicitation...The state must usually prove that the solicitor intended the crime to be committed, although the crime does not actually have to be carried out. What is essential, at least under federal law, is that the solicitor "solicits, commands, induces, or otherwise endeavors to persuade"(1) someone else to engage in the crime. The essence of solicitation is language.

The speech act that the defendant must have performed is a request, or perhaps an offer or command.

1. 18 U.S.C. ​§ 373 (2000)
Trump is unequivocally guilty of a crime.

Whereas his likely tax fraud and his near-certain collusion with Russia remain hidden due to his relentless obstruction of justice (a prosecutable offense in itself), his crime of solicitation is now a matter of public record (WSJ, BBC, Fox News). Using one's office to launch a very dubious investigation into one's political opponent in an upcoming election is downright corruption, not to mention a huge conflict of interest.

His continued bullying of witnesses on Capitol Hill is also a matter of public record (BBC, Reuters), as well as his ambiguous allusion to "handling spies" such as the whistleblower. This is almost certainly witness tampering. I now present another quote from Solan & Tiersma (p. 204):
Indirect and Ambiguous Threats​
Threats - like other speech acts in general and like crimes of language in particular - tend to be made indirectly. Alternatively, they may be phrased in ambiguous terms to give them plausible deniability. As with other speech acts, pragmatic factors count for a lot in determining whether an utterance is a threat or something else.
The text goes on to prove at length that a speech act "counts" as a threat if it was intended to intimidate the victim, and that victim's perceptions are relevant. To quote the above article from Reuters: "Representative Adam Schiff, who is chairing the hearing in the House Intelligence Committee, asked Yovanovitch for her reaction to the tweet. She said it was 'very intimidating.' ”

Regardless of your politics, the highest office in the land is, and rightfully ought to be, accountable to the law. Whether the Senate Republicans abide by their constitutional oath or not remains to be seen, but even if they don't, the man is absolutely guilty.


There is no rational defense.  
2 Comments
Zilliox
11/24/2019 01:36:09 pm

I would agree with you and the argument you're making, to a degree. However, you lose credibility in your focus, as many media outlets have also done to themselves, and politicians, by addressing something that is not in direct relationship to the issue at hand and with only conspiracy evidence. In this case, it's accusing him of tax fraud when in fact there is no evidence of this yet. To suggest it is hearsay. Basically, I can't agree with the argument if you title it "unequivocally guilty of a crime, and then the first sentence says "likely". This is a logical error and basically a fallacy, and while powerful, I believe you would want the argument to be void of these errors as fallacies are what Trump uses throughout his speech to falsely convince others of his views. Other accounts do exist of him tampering. For example, there is clear records of personnel citing that they did not follow his orders to fire/cease certain people in their investigations into him. The fact that he ordered it is the crime. Just because that too, was not carried out similar to the Ukraine scandal, does not make it free of a crime. Heck, even the driver for a bank robbery is considered just as guilty, even if they never went in, and they didn't bring out any money in the end. Something to think about in relationship.

Reply
John
11/26/2019 01:56:43 pm

That's a very fair critique, I've added a substantiating link to that particular claim. Since Cohen went to prison for violating campaign finance law, it's likely that Trump also claimed the hush money payments as "campaign expenses" on his tax return. That would explain his rabid attempt to keep the tax returns secret. Also, see below for his response to claiming a billion dollars in losses from 1985-1994. He explicitly states it was an attempt to cheat the tax code.

https://www.bbc.com/news/business-48201786

Reply



Leave a Reply.

    Author

    I'm J.R., a US Navy veteran and Linguist. This blog is devoted to insights and experiences I've gained over the years.

    Archives

    February 2022
    February 2021
    November 2020
    September 2020
    August 2020
    July 2020
    May 2020
    March 2020
    November 2019
    October 2019
    May 2019
    March 2019
    February 2019
    December 2018
    August 2018
    July 2018
    June 2018
    May 2018
    March 2018
    February 2018
    January 2018
    October 2017
    September 2017
    August 2017
    July 2017
    April 2017
    December 2016
    October 2016
    September 2016
    August 2016
    June 2016
    May 2016
    April 2016
    February 2016
    November 2015
    October 2015
    September 2015
    July 2015
    June 2015
    May 2015
    March 2015
    February 2015
    January 2015
    November 2014
    October 2014
    September 2014
    August 2014
    June 2014
    May 2014
    March 2014
    February 2014
    January 2014
    December 2013
    November 2013
    October 2013

    Categories

    All
    Boldness
    Discipline
    Evangelism
    Faith
    Freedom
    Guilt
    Hardship
    Jesus
    Justice
    Manliness
    On Killing
    Perseverance
    PODCAST
    Rebirth
    Redemption
    Remember
    Respect
    Sin
    Success
    The Future
    The Nature Of Life
    The New Reformation

    RSS Feed

Copyright © 2013-2021 All Rights Reserved, J.R. Dudley www.sailingforhome.com